Affirmative Action Debate
Affirmative Action Debate
Be it resolved, affirmative action should be based on class, not race
In a landmark ruling, The United States Supreme Court rejected affirmative action at US colleges, determining that race should not be a factor in achieving educational diversity. The controversial decision is expected to lower the admission rates of black and hispanic students at elite universities. Many supporters of the court’s decision believe that affirmative action – that is, policies that aim to increase opportunities provided to underrepresented members of society – should be based on class, not race. Focusing on the disadvantaged of all races would create a more fair environment that is based on real need. Furthermore, they argue, affirmative action in its current form lowers standards for black students applying to universities, promoting different criterions based on race and therefore perpetuating a system of racism and inequality on campus.
Others argue that replacing race-based affirmative action with economic need will hurt black students more as they will now be judged against a much bigger population percentage of poor whites and asians. Affirmative action was introduced in the 1960’s in order to address the country’s history of systemic racism towards black Americans that victims of class-based inequalities did not face. The decision by SCOTUS reverses years of racial progress and ignores the reality of racism in modern America, because, as Justice Ketanji Jackson wrote in her descent, “Deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life.”
“What we mean by taking race into account is admitting especially Black and Latino students under lowered standards compared to other students”
-JOHN MCWHORTER
“The force of race in American life is still sufficiently powerful that in a number of areas it should remain as something to take into account in seeking to allocate scarce resources.”
-RANDALL KENNEDY
Con
You may also like
May 15, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: The Crisis of Canadian Democracy
May 26, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Carney’s bumpy start and Canada’s weaknesses exposed
June 3, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Mark Carney’s economic plan to get Canada back on track
June 9, 2025
– Listen
Munk Debates Podcast: Be it Resolved, this is America’s golden age
June 16, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Yossi Klein Halevi: why the West must support Israel’s war against Iran
July 3, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: how do you negotiate with Donald Trump?
July 10, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: irresponsible tax cuts on both sides of the border
July 15, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Canada seeks to diversify its trade partnerships beyond the U.S
July 23, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: we are living through the golden age of conspiracy theories
July 29, 2025
