Affirmative Action Debate
Affirmative Action Debate
Be it resolved, affirmative action should be based on class, not race
In a landmark ruling, The United States Supreme Court rejected affirmative action at US colleges, determining that race should not be a factor in achieving educational diversity. The controversial decision is expected to lower the admission rates of black and hispanic students at elite universities. Many supporters of the court’s decision believe that affirmative action – that is, policies that aim to increase opportunities provided to underrepresented members of society – should be based on class, not race. Focusing on the disadvantaged of all races would create a more fair environment that is based on real need. Furthermore, they argue, affirmative action in its current form lowers standards for black students applying to universities, promoting different criterions based on race and therefore perpetuating a system of racism and inequality on campus.
Others argue that replacing race-based affirmative action with economic need will hurt black students more as they will now be judged against a much bigger population percentage of poor whites and asians. Affirmative action was introduced in the 1960’s in order to address the country’s history of systemic racism towards black Americans that victims of class-based inequalities did not face. The decision by SCOTUS reverses years of racial progress and ignores the reality of racism in modern America, because, as Justice Ketanji Jackson wrote in her descent, “Deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life.”
“What we mean by taking race into account is admitting especially Black and Latino students under lowered standards compared to other students”
-JOHN MCWHORTER
“The force of race in American life is still sufficiently powerful that in a number of areas it should remain as something to take into account in seeking to allocate scarce resources.”
-RANDALL KENNEDY
Con
You may also like
August 19, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: a phony peace deal for Ukraine could put all of Europe at risk
August 26, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: the US slides towards dictatorship and Carney clings to Canada’s peacemaking past
September 3, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: A public display of friendship between China, Russia, and India is a searing indictment of Trump’s foreign policy
September 10, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Trump is stuck in a dangerous spiral feedback loop and Rudyard and Andrew debate Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker program
September 24, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Carney’s Palestinian statehood recognition comes without conditions and the powerful companies benefiting from Trump’s authoritarianism
October 2, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Trump’s military speech ramblings should concern every Canadian
October 7, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Trump sends in the National Guard (again) and Mark Carney goes to Washington
October 16, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Trump’s Middle East diplomacy and why Canada should re-evaluate its auto sector subsidies
October 21, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Putin’s hold over Trump and Pierre Poilievre makes a stunning accusation
December 3, 2025
– Watch
Two-State Solution Debate
October 28, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Trump’s trade tantrum and will Mark Carney’s first federal budget meet the moment?
November 6, 2025
